Clarke attacks 'catastrophic' war Ken Clarke Mr Clarke voted against going to war in Iraq in 2003 Conservative leadership contender Ken Clarke has said Tony Blair made a "catastrophic error" in involving the UK in the war with Iraq.
The ex-chancellor, who opposed the war, said the reasons given for the UK supporting the war were "bogus".
The war had increased the threat to the UK from Islamic extremists, he said.
If Mr Blair believed there was no connection between his Iraq policy and the London bombs "he must be the only person left who thinks that", he said.
Whoever is in power over the next few years is going to find this (tackling the terrorist threat) is going to be number one on their agenda Kenneth Clarke
Full text of Ken Clarke's speech
Mr Clarke also warned against "instant legislation" after terrorist attacks.
"There is no evidence that any bomb has gone off because of any gap in the law," he said.
"Whoever is in power over the next few years is going to find this (tackling the terrorist threat) is going to be number one on their agenda, over and over again," he told journalists at the Foreign Press Association.
"Disengagement from Iraq has to be part of a much larger and more sophisticated political programme than we are delivering at the moment. But this is all part of a much bigger picture."
US presidents
Mr Clarke referred to his experience serving in a Conservative government tackling the Northern Ireland terrorism threats, speaking of "several Parliamentary colleagues" he lost due to Irish terrorists.
He said the fight against Islamic extremist terrorists should not undermine the "fundamental belief" in the rule of law or give terrorists new grievances which they can exploit.
The government had to be honest about the threat and work with the whole democratic world to tackle the issue.
Mr Clarke said he was keen to "strengthen the alliance" with the US, but added that "US presidents are not always right".
He said the US "failure to prepare" for the consequences of the invasion had led to a "horrifying increase in terrorism".
There should be one independent scrutiny body reporting to parliament on anti-terrorisms powers, including the actions of police and the recent use of the "shoot to protect" policy.
Rival candidate
Referring to the Tory leadership battle, the former Tory chancellor said it was his aim make a "serious speech" and open debate among other contenders for what he called "big issues".
"Any future leader of the party or of the country had to be "capable of addressing these big issues," he said, while conceding that his competitors for the Conservative crown were all "very able men".
Also on Thursday, as the Conservative leadership race heats up, rival contender David Cameron interrupted a holiday to make a separate speech.
David Cameron David Cameron will make a speech on the same day as Mr Clarke
The shadow education secretary called for tax relief to make childcare more affordable to give women more choice in crucial decisions.
His aides say the timing - on the day of Mr Clarke's first major speech - is entirely coincidental.
Mr Clarke earlier dismissed suggestions he was too pro-European and too old, at 65, to replace Michael Howard.
He told the BBC's new political editor Nick Robinson he was "overwhelmingly more popular" than any of his rivals.
This is the Rushcliffe MP's third attempt to win the Tory leadership.
His pro-euro views were blamed for his defeats in 1997 and 2001 but he now says his enthusiasm for UK euro membership has cooled.
As well as Mr Cameron, Mr Clarke's other potential rivals include shadow cabinet ministers David Davis, Liam Fox, Andrew Lansley, Theresa May, Sir Malcolm Rifkind and David Willetts. -Bbc news
So which of this lot do you think should be the leader? I think Clark should get it he is clearly the most centerist and he will provide a good opposition to Blair/Brown especially in Parliment. But seeing as the tory party will never give up its right wing tendancies it will probably be David Davis.
Love_Libs- 09-02-2005
Well if they want to appeal to more people, I think Davis is the obvious choice, Cameron is an outsider in this respect - he represents a younger Tory element but Davis would stand more chance at the next immediate Election. Clarke is likely to be the strongest challenger to Davis, though if the Tories want to stop getting it wrong, David Davis seems to me to be the obvious and only real choice.
FuzzyHarmonics- 09-08-2005
David Davis is vastly reactionary, opportunist and absurdly right-wing. He's a second hand car salesman in a posher suit.
Clarke's domestic policies are much the same, but at least he could take some steps towards controlling the boderline xenephobic nationalists in the conservative party with regards to europe.
Jared- 09-08-2005
Iain Duncan Smith
B1oodFlower- 09-08-2005
Yeah William Hague wouldnt be a bad shout either have you seen him in a baseball cap?
FuzzyHarmonics- 09-08-2005
I think this election contest essentially comes down to who is the least abhorrant, not who is best.
frankiegoestostoke- 09-13-2005
My money's on Ken Clarke.
However, I'd like to see Liam Fox as leader. Simply because he is so utterly unelectable
Arran- 09-13-2005
What with all the 80's music and haircuts around at present, why don't we just go the whole hog and vote in thatcher again?
B1oodFlower- 11-14-2005
Davis Vs Cameron.
Its either Cameron a tory boy trying to be blair or Davis who is clearly more right wing than Howard.
Love_Libs- 11-20-2005
I've changed my mind now. Cameron!
B1oodFlower- 11-20-2005
Neither of them do much for me, Cameron seems to be more of a moderniser: a more polished politician but he seems quite cyncial and vote driven, similiar in a way to a young Blair. I'm awaiting Gordon Brown to see what kind of PM he makes...
socialist cook- 12-07-2005
Cameron is apparently a good constituency MP, so a Uni friend has told me.
But i just think it's early days to judge whether a man most of the press don't really know a lot about, is going to be a good leader or not.
However, this is the Conservative Party we're talking about- they do like sharpening knives ready to stab people in the back!
Also, some of them hold grudges for a very long time.....
Just see Michael Heseltine at the moment calling for Cameron to step down before the right wing loonies get him. Yes, but we don't have Thatcher running the country now Michael....
B1oodFlower- 12-07-2005
Gee he's young for a leader at 39 I guess the tory's are desperate.
At least he's not as right wing as howard, ids ect But it might lead to alot of consensus and a lack of difference between party policy until Brown gets in... Apparently William Hague is coming back to his shadow cabinet, wonder if he still has his baseball cap and whether he can still drink ten pints a night.
socialist cook- 12-07-2005
Now Iain Duncan Smith's problem was he was actually too nice a man!
I think if you had a pint with him, then it would be a good one!
We're never going to get a leftie tory though, unless Clarke actually won.... and he will never ever stand again!
It's too early for Cameron at the moment.
*said as I missed PMQs*
alexliamw- 12-07-2005
Cameron is so New Labour it hurts. He's trying to do the exact same thing. An essentially non-ideologic power-seeker. And now the Tories have decided to go in for the whole "social justice" thing, one of the few substantial ideological differences between the two main parties - even if it may have been more semantic than Labour would have you believe - has evaporated.
Forumer™ is Voted #1 Free Forum Hosting provider
Build your own community today with the largest message board hosting company.